Tell us what you think about the new Find Articles (Beta)

Your first impression of using this new search feature to find articles is: *

It seems very useful, and I think it could become one of my primary search tools to use for finding articles.

It seems useful, and I will probably use it about as often as I use other search tools to find articles.

I don't really find it useful, and I probably will not use it. (Please tell us why):

Tell us about the article(s) that you were searching for: *

Please tell us the article title, search keywords, or the journal name you used for your search. If you had trouble finding what you were looking for, this will help us diagnose and work toward fixing the problem.

The search results were:

Highly relevant right off the bat. I found good results without having to refine my search.

Relevant only after I tried different search terms or used facets to narrow things down.

Not relevant at all.

Other...

Please provide your comment, if select "Other..."

What options would help make default searches better? Please indicate your preferences:

Please select as many options as you prefer.

By default, search results should only include articles that have the full-text available online.

By default, search results should only include articles from Scholarly Publications, including peer reviewed materials.

By default, search results should only include peer reviewed materials.

By default, search results should include more content types than just journal articles.

By default, search results should not include materials from other libraries that are only available via Interlibrary Loan.

The system should also suggest particular databases that might be relevant to my search.

Additional Comments:

User Interfaces Unit

Tell us what you think about the new Find Articles (Beta)